NEH Grant Day 6/Friday July 17th
Today’s topic is ‘remaking tradition: what is modern?’
We will be looking at …. what are the tenants of modernism? How do early Chicago skyscrapers compare and contrast with the work of Mies van de Rohe who drew on a tradition of architectural forms to reinvent the skyscraper after WWII?

Reliance Building
Our morning lecture was delivered by Mr. Douglas Gilbert, of Harboe Architects, The Design and Restoration of the Reliance Building. As a lead architect on the renovation of the historic Reliance Building in 1995, Gilbert will discuss how this building with its unusually thin curtain wall, is often seen as an important ‘protomodern’ building in American architecture.
Skyscraper was not intended by one person in one place. Power of intention appears over time , thorough the building’s life span. The is a gap in building construction in the Chicago Loop between the 20s- 50s. During WWII, many people construction workers went off to war, money was scarce, resources ( such as steel) were scarce. Modern styles buildings in Chicago examples are Prudential and Inland Steel Building, Federal Center.
Harboe Associates worked on Reliance Building restoration in 1995, also the Rookery renovation (17 Adams Street). Discuss building with its thin curtain wall, is often seen as an important “protomodern’ building in American architecture. Reliance I typical of Chicago School style, large pane windows with two slender levered windows on either side to open for ventilation. Currently, it is Chicago building code that these windows open is the space inhabited is a space for residential purpose ( namely hotels, condos etc.) Also the defined arch indicate a typical Chicago School.
Great Fire occurred in October 1871.
Post fire 1880s- architecture began to become innovative in style. For example the Monatuck Building in 1882. While not highly ornate, the thickness of the walls at the base are 16 feet thick to allow for load bearing capacity. The accentuation of the columns on the front and back façade to e are recessed in and not draw attention to vertically , yet, width is accentuated by the piers which are drawn out. This visual trick gives the impression of the building being high, though not too high, as that the word ‘skyscraper’ scared many in the 1880s. With the advent of Otis’s safety elevator, buildings could safely transport people up and down with minimal effort, yet with easing fears for safety. As business grew, only way to go was up. Technological advances allowed for this. Also, as business grew, it was possible to house the entire organization in one building. Manotuck was seen by some as one of the first skyscrapers. Little ornamentation exists on the Manutock building.

terracota tiles in need of renovation
Home Insurance Building (1883) stacked floor building, first to use a metal skeletal frame to carry the load of each floor. Jenny’s design is seen as a the first skyscraper for this very reason, not only because of its height, but this use of steel and skeletal framework, which is still used to this day.
Tacoma Building (1886) need to cover columns and spandrels, almost all glass in walls very little masonry.
Skeletal frames allowed for a quicker construction time, building could be built in stages. As steel frame is going up on higher floors, lower levels which already had their skeletal frame could being installing walls, doors, trim, etc. Early 1890s architects more commonly began to express themselves vertically before, architects tried to lower height of building visually as not to scare people, tapering of building floors was common
Reliance Building was owned by William Hale in 1880s. Hale bought property and was interested in land devlopement yet was also involved in the elevator industry as an associated of Otis. Safety features such as a motor control ans safety brakes increased public’s confidence in elevator usage. Burnham and Root were hired to design the office building. Tenants on top floors would not move out until their leases ran out. Thus, the architects, jacked up the higher levels and began building on the lower levels. Root dies in 1891 of ammonia. By 1894, Hale wants to knock off the top and re build the now vacant portion. Charles Atwood died in 1895 ( opium addict).
The Reliance Building is an early example of a curtain wall. It is typical of the Chicago School: iconic, minimal masonry, large windows.
By 1980s, building was in disrepair, a seedy area, filled with tarot card readers and less savory occupants. By the 1990s, the City of Chicago bought the building with TIFF monies ( regional tax funds generated from soley that area of town). Monies were used to clean the exterior of grim and soot to show the white terracotta exterior cladding. Idea was to sell to a developer to manage. Interior was kept as closely to the time period as possible, yet challenge lies in matching with modern day building code requirement. Hence, the bird cage elevator system is new, with a wrought iron grill framing a the elevator shaft. The shat is covered in the required materials, yet painted and light in such a manner to give the appearance of sunlight and airiness behind the grill. The grill design is carried over to the stainless steel elevator doors in a black grill etching. The tile flooring was replaced and recreated to compliment the original design, Turkish masons recreated the pattern on a gluey web, and shipped. When the mosaic tile was received, it was rolled out in a sheet , matched pieces to fit, then cemented and grouted. The result is an intricate rose coloured diamond pattern gleaming on the lobby floor. Lightening was replaced from the old gas lighting to modern and safer electric. The lightening fixtures are exact replicas of the originals .
The huge Chicago school glass windows required replacing, as that the originals were a ¼ of an inch thick and not wind bearing ( unsafe when the winter winds blow in the windy city). New insulated glass fabrication occurred. Increasing safety and energy standpoints. Rollerwave and distortion on the float glass and heat strengthening, thus giving the glass a slight aged distortion. A recreated cornice , designed to compliment the original was installed. While it sticks out three feet form the building, it will accommodate window washers and their hanging scaffolding.







Our group then walked over to the Reliance Building for a guided tour with the CAF docents. Buildings in need of restoration or which were in the process of being resorted were pointed out. By the by, teachers can stay in the Hotel Burnham , located at 32 N. State Street ,(what is now the renovated Reliance Building) at a greatly reduced rate of 75$ per night, during specific dates. Call the hotel directly to book reservations at 312-782-1111 to ask for the “teacher time out” program. During our tour of the Hotel Burnham, Mr. Gilbert was on site to answer any questions.

Sugar Bliss
We broke up for lunch by 12.15 with a promise to be back for 1.30pm. Since I was one block away from the famous Sugar Bliss, I made a bee line right away to pick up two of
the most schrumpous cupcakes of my life. One was regular size, vanilla, with a cream cheese frosting and coconut sprinkled on top, the other was a min cup cake, chocolate with chocolate/cappuccino flavouring. I cannot articular in words just how wonderful both cupcakes were. This is a definite stop on any Chicago tour. Right across the street from Macy’s ( the old Marshall Field’s store). To Mrs. Pullen, my Head of School and fellow cupcake aficionado, I have a brochure for you to take note of its location. While I can hear my mother in my ear claiming that cupcakes are not a nutrition lunch, I did purchase a sandwich at the café Around the Cornerin our Santa Fe building. I then proceeded to the Art Institute of Chicago’s garden for some reflection time in a splendid leafy green garden . And yes, I enjoyed my cupcakes. Immensely. After admiring the sculpture, I then returned to class for our 1.30pm lecture.

Our afternoon lecture was delivered by Paul Stienbrecher of Interactive Design Inc. Paul’s lecture Mies in Chicago : Why not all Glass boxes are alike. As a member of the renovation team of Mies van der Rohe’s Federal center, Steinbrecher will discuss modernism and Mies’s work in particular, as well as Chicago’s reaction to the glass and steel box. I think that it was a collective feeling by the group that a bit more time could have been focused on modernism and post modernism. While both styles did not happen during the 20s and 30s, at a time when Chicago’s skyscrapers came into being, many of our children can and do relate to the shiniest of modernism style.
Federal Building is best described as very linear, with little ornamentation. One could almost ascertain that the reflections cast from neighbouring building onto the Federal Buildings windows are an ornamentation of sorts. The entire ‘pad’ is covered in the same travertine from Minnesota, both sites spread over two blocks, for it was Mies’ intention that the buildings in their simplicity appear as if they are floating or hovering over the site. This out door flooring continues uninterrupted as the interior flooring as well. The glass walls often meet with a steel vertical column in the middle of the column. The corners of the building appear infinite as the glass corners do not meet a column, but just simply end. By standing on the plaza the viewer’s eye can pick a random line in the travertine squares and follow the seams to meet up with a post in each of the buildings in both directions. This echoes an architect’s primary rule of measurement: never cut a brick; plan a room size around the sick of the brick. Thus, let the materials speak. A geometric 90 degree angle pattern is present.
Louis Sullivan believed that ‘form followed function’. Mies thought this to be ridiculous. As a rational form, building can take shape of what it is employed for. Modernism in Miees is a standard. After WWII, anything you do in creation is evidence of rational design. And a rational act has organization. We think in terms of who we work, not nature. Attempts at being natural does nto work. Modernism is a different way of looking at the world (seeking answer in resolute).
We then proceeded to the Federal Building to compare and contrast the current building and the previous building on this site, the Old Chicago City Hall.
Mr. Stienbrecher was one of the best lecturers this week, if not one of the best two, hands down. He was engaging, interesting, and very knowledgeable on the subject matter of Mies and his buildings. I thoroughly enjoyed his presentation.
A best practise field study at the Federal Center of a guided observation, comparison contrast and sketching exercises.
Today’s discussions defined what is modernism. We discussed that the greenest building is the one which is currently standing by making use of what you already have. By tearing out existing materials to replace with more materials is merely creating a higher level of consumption and not addressing reduction of need. How long can we use the term modern?Do we still call the building constructed int he 50s modern? And for how long? Post modernism is a mishmash of borrowed styles to create something new to reflect what we are thinking at that time. Though again, how long can we use the term post modern? What will be the next style which emerges from modernism/post moderism? it could be stated that architecture has little to do with forms by is a battlefield of the architect’s spirit. Architecture reflects uses and needs of user at a given time. In the case of the Federal Building, the architecture reflects what the government means to us, to society at the time. Who decides if architecture is tasteful? Who decides if it stays or goes?

Sarah reading between the lions ( librarian humor)
Supper at Ginoadarnos was planned but did not happen. Sorry Chicago friends with whom I work. Yes, this means you Joni. I will atone for this horrible crime in the near future. Upon dismissal it was threatening to rain, so, I ducked in to the Art Institute ( it was a freebie Friday, no charge for admission). In addition to the many fantastic pieces of art work which I have studied during my undergraduate years, I was totally in awe of an exhibition of art from the 2006 to 2009 Caldecott award winners by the lower level stairwell. ( For those of your who might not be aware, Caldecott awards are given out each January to honor the best in children’s book illustrations). Such a treat for me!
I then walked over to Macy’s ( the old Marshall Field’s building) to get a better photo of the famous Louis C. Tiffany glass mosaic ceiling, built in 1907 . It is the first dome to be built in favrile iridescent glass as well as being the largest glass mosaic containing over 1.6 million pieces. “Favrile” (handmade) and the “iridescent effect” was obtained by mixing different colors of glass whilestill hot during the manufacturing process, patented in 1894 by Louis Comfort Tiffany.
On my way back to my dorm room on State Street, I ducked into Filene’s Basement to escape the rain. I can remember enjoy shopping at Filene’s when we lived in Vermont, though I had no idea Filene’s Basement existed. ( Of course it does? How else would the building be supported without a basement?! Ha.). A number of good deals. After about 30 minutes, I was able to get back to my dorm without getting wet . I began packing, working on this blog as well as working on my workshop evaluation.
No Chicago pizza, Joni. I hang my head in shame.
***********************